首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论民事诉讼中的摸索证明
引用本文:周成泓. 论民事诉讼中的摸索证明[J]. 法律科学, 2008, 26(4): 142-150
作者姓名:周成泓
作者单位:广东商学院法学院 广东广州510320
摘    要:摸索证明的基本含义是指证据声请以获取相关信息为目的。根据古典辩论主义,摸索证明应予禁止。但在修正辩论主义下,对其不应一概予以否定,而应综合考虑对辩论主义所做各种修正,即真实、完全义务、具体化义务、诉讼促进义务和诉讼经济、诚信原则和防止滥用诉讼权利等,根据实际情况予以判断。在我国,由于自起诉即要求表明、提交证据,摸索证明有其特殊性。此外,摸索证明与证据声请、证据保全、当事人陈述等制度也有着密切联系。总体而言,由于我国民事诉讼的职权主义色彩仍然较浓以及受制于大环境因素,对摸索证明的处理应当更为宽松。

关 键 词:摸索证明  辩论主义  修正辩论主义  中国民事诉讼

Fishing Expedition in Civil Procedure
ZHOU Cheng-hong. Fishing Expedition in Civil Procedure[J]. Law Science (Journal of Northwest Institute University of Politics and Law), 2008, 26(4): 142-150
Authors:ZHOU Cheng-hong
Affiliation:ZHOU Cheng-hong
Abstract:The basic meaning of fishing expedition is that the request for evidence investigation aiming at acquiring inter-related information.Judged by classical principle of debate,fishing expedition is illegal,whereas it is sometimes positive in modificatory principle of debate,because of adoption of truth obligation,materialization obligation,litigation promotion obligation and efficiency,good faith and abuse of procedural rights.In China,fishing expedition is specialized for the sake of requirement of producing evidence from beginning of litigation.Besides,requests for evidence investigation,evidence secure and statement of party are also considered.In short,restricted by thick court control of civil procedure and social surroundings,the fishing expedition should be treated more leniently than the continental law.
Keywords:fishing expedition  principle of debate  modificatory principle of debate  civil procedure of China
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号