首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

公正和效率的两难选择——评刑事诉讼法有关侦查程序的修改
引用本文:胡卫平.公正和效率的两难选择——评刑事诉讼法有关侦查程序的修改[J].铁道警官高等专科学校学报,2012,22(4):43-49.
作者姓名:胡卫平
作者单位:西安政治学院军事安全保卫系,陕西西安,710068
摘    要:我国侦查活动中公正和效率价值的双重缺失一直受到诟病。“宽严相济”刑事司法政策的确立以及司法体制和工作机制改革决策助推了刑事诉讼法再修改。立足于公正和效率价值的平衡,本次刑事诉讼法修改对有关侦查活动的证据制度、强制措施、辩护程序、讯问程序、侦查措施、侦查行为的监督等进行了完善。但基于我国国情,在人权保障、诉讼构造、侦查构造、侦查程序的科学性、侦查程序自治、侦查程序借鉴等方面.理想与现实之间仍存在一定差距。

关 键 词:刑事诉讼法  公正  证据  侦查程序

A Dilemma between Fairness and Performance --A Review on the Revise of the Investigative Procedure in Criminal Procedure Law
Hu Weiping.A Dilemma between Fairness and Performance --A Review on the Revise of the Investigative Procedure in Criminal Procedure Law[J].Journal of Railway Ministry Zhengzhou Police College,2012,22(4):43-49.
Authors:Hu Weiping
Institution:Hu Weiping(Department of Military Security,Xi’an University for Political Sciences,Xi’an 710068,China)
Abstract:The lack in both fairness and performance in Chinese investigation has always been denounced.The establishment of the criminal justice policy "to temper justice with mercy" and the reform in justice system and working mechanism promoted the second revise of criminal procedure law.According to the balance between fairness and performance,this revise perfected the evidence system,enforcement measures,defence procedure,interrogation procedure,investigation measures,and the supervision over investigative action,etc.Whereas,on the base of the Chinese condition,the reality is still far from the ideal at such the aspects as the safeguard for human rights,the structure of lawsuit,the structure of investigation,as well as the scientificity,self-rule and reference of interrogation procedure.
Keywords:criminal procedure law  justice  evidence  investigation procedure
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号