Comparative Assessment of a Novel Photo‐Anthropometric Landmark‐Positioning Approach for the Analysis of Facial Structures on Two‐Dimensional Images |
| |
Authors: | Marta R. P. Flores M.Sc. Carlos E. P. Machado Ph.D. Matteo D. Gallidabino Ph.D. Gustavo H. M. de Arruda Ph.D. Ricardo H. A. da Silva Ph.D. Flávio B. de Vidal Ph.D. Rodolfo F. H. Melani Ph.D. |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Social Department of the Dentistry College, University of Sao Paulo, Avenida Professor Lineu Prestes 2227, Sao Paulo, 05508‐000 BrazilCorresponding author: Marta R. P. Flores, M.Sc. E‐mail:;2. Brazilian Federal Police, National Institute of Criminalistics, INC Building, Brasília, 70610‐200 Brazil;3. Centre for Forensic Science, Department of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Ellison Building, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 8ST U.K;4. Brazilian Federal Police, Technical and Scientific Sector, Rua Annita Luiza Mello Di Lascio, Cabedelo, 58101‐770 Brazil;5. Department of Stomatology, Public Health and Forensic Odontology, Dentistry College of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Avenida do Café, Ribeirao Preto, 14040‐904 Brazil;6. Department of Computer Science, University of Brasilia, Darcy Ribeiro Campus, Asa Norte, Brasilia, 70910‐900 Brazil;7. Social Department of the Dentistry College, University of Sao Paulo, Avenida Professor Lineu Prestes 2227, Sao Paulo, 05508‐000 Brazil |
| |
Abstract: | Positioning landmarks in facial photo‐anthropometry (FPA) applications remains today a highly variable procedure, as traditional cephalometric definitions are used as guidelines. Herein, a novel landmark‐positioning approach, specifically adapted for FPA applications, is introduced and, in particular, assessed against the conventional cephalometric definitions for the analysis of 16 landmarks on ten frontal images by two groups of examiners (with and without professional knowledge of anatomy). Results showed that positioning reproducibility was significantly better using the novel method. Indeed, in contrast to the classic approach, very low landmark dispersions were observed for both groups of examiners, which were usually below the strictest clinical standards (i.e., 0.575 mm). Furthermore, the comparison between the two groups of examiners highlighted higher dispersion consistencies, which supported a higher robustness. Thus, the use of an adapted landmark‐positioning approach proved to be highly advantageous in FPA analysis and future work in this field should consider adopting similar methodologies. |
| |
Keywords: | forensic science facial analysis anthropometry cephalometry facial identification facial image |
|
|