| 权威命题与来源命题——排他性法律实证主义的一种论证理路 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 朱振. 权威命题与来源命题——排他性法律实证主义的一种论证理路[J]. 法制与社会发展, 2009, 0(3) |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 朱振 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 吉林大学理论法学研究中心; |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社科基金青年项目“法律的权威性:基于实践哲学的研究”(08CFX003) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 来源命题(the sources thesis)指的是法律的存在及内容完全是一个社会事实问题,拉兹用来自权威的论据(即法律必然主张合法性权威)来论证这一命题。同时拉兹也以权威论据批判德沃金的融贯命题和Coleman的道德安置命题(moral incorporation thesis),并最终表明,来源命题是唯一与权威论相符合的理论主张。
|
| 关 键 词： | 融贯 权威 来源命题 |
Authoritative Thesis and Sources Thesis:An Argument Approach of Exclusive Legal Positivism |
| |
| ZHU Zhen. Authoritative Thesis and Sources Thesis:An Argument Approach of Exclusive Legal Positivism[J]. Law and Social Development, 2009, 0(3) |
| |
| Authors: | ZHU Zhen |
| |
| Affiliation: | The Center for Jurisprudence Research;Jilin University;Changchun;Jilin;130012 |
| |
| Abstract: | The sources thesis means that the existence and content of law is fully a social determined,the argument of which is employed from authority by Raz,i.e.,Law must relies on legitimate authority. Meanwhile,Raz made critics on Dworkin's coherence thesis and Coleman's moral incorporation thesis,and proved that the sources thesis is the unique theoretical claim in line with the theory of authority. |
| |
| Keywords: | coherence authority sources thesis |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
