首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

我国刑事起诉标准的模式选择
引用本文:王超,姚晓东. 我国刑事起诉标准的模式选择[J]. 时代法学, 2009, 7(5): 62-68
作者姓名:王超  姚晓东
作者单位:1. 北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院,北京,100875
2. 临沂市兰三区人民检察院,山东临沂,276003
摘    要:与有罪判决证明标准相比,刑事起诉标准存在两种模式,一种是二者相同模式,另一种是前者高于后者模式。这两种模式各有优缺点,很难断定它们谁优谁劣。尽管从理论上讲我国刑事起诉标准与刑事诉讼的一般规律相悖,但是从司法实践来看现行偏高的刑事起诉标准具有一定的合理性。不过,随着刑事诉讼法的修改与完善,我国不宜维持目前偏高的刑事起诉标准,应当对其予以适当降低。考虑到刑事诉讼的认识规律和我国的特殊国情,我国刑事起诉标准可以表述为“较大的定罪可能性”。

关 键 词:刑事起诉标准  证明标准  模式

On the Mode Selection of Criminal Prosecutive Standard in China
WANG Chao,YAO Xiao-dong. On the Mode Selection of Criminal Prosecutive Standard in China[J]. Presentday Law Science, 2009, 7(5): 62-68
Authors:WANG Chao  YAO Xiao-dong
Affiliation:1.College for Criminal Law Science of Beijing Normal University;Beijing 100875;China;2.Linyi Lansan District People's Procuratorate;Linyi;Shandong 276003;China
Abstract:Compared with standard of proof for the guilty sentence,there are two modes about standard of criminal prosecution,namely,the former equals to the latter,or the former is higher than the latter.They have their respective merits and demerits and it is difficult to judge which mode is better.In theory,Chinese criminal prosecutive standard contradicts with general rules of criminal procedure.However,relative high criminal prosecutive standard may be reasonable from the judicial practice in China.With the modif...
Keywords:standard of criminal prosecution  standard of proof  mode  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号