首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论抢劫罪、强奸罪客观行为之异同
引用本文:邓淑娅. 论抢劫罪、强奸罪客观行为之异同[J]. 黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报, 2011, 0(1): 51-53
作者姓名:邓淑娅
作者单位:华东政法大学研究生教育学院,上海,200042
摘    要:对于抢劫罪与强奸罪的客观行为,在目前我国的刑法基本文本中表述是大致相同的.由此,在学界,关于如何理解刑法第263条抢劫罪与刑法第236条强奸罪的客观行为有了一定的争议.在目前我国刑法文本的框架下,采取体系解释的方式,两个条文中共同存在的“暴力、胁迫或者其他方法”的客观行为具有较为巨大的差异性和不同性,基于两个条文的自身...

关 键 词:抢劫罪  强奸罪  客观行为异同  体系解释

The Study on the Different Objective Behavior of Robbery and Rape
DENG Shu-ya. The Study on the Different Objective Behavior of Robbery and Rape[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law, 2011, 0(1): 51-53
Authors:DENG Shu-ya
Affiliation:DENG Shu-ya
Abstract:At present,it has the same expression in our criminal law on the objective behavior of robbery and rape.So,in the academic community,there are many disputes on how to understand the object behavior of the criminal law article 263 of robbery and article 236 of rape.In structure of Chinese criminal law,on the view of systematic interpretation,the writer thinks that there are difference meanings in the objective behavior between robbery and rape.So based on different nature of the robbery and rape and the limi...
Keywords:Robbery  Rape  the Difference on the Objective behavior  systematic interpretation  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号