| 请求权与债权之关系的理论误区 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 宋旭明. 请求权与债权之关系的理论误区[J]. 黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报, 2006, 0(5): 120-123 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 宋旭明 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 厦门大学,法学院,福建,厦门,361005 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对于请求权与债权在<德国民法典>中的实质一致性界定所导致的混淆,传统上以二者实质一致且系一般与特殊关系的解释将导致诸多理论困惑,各种标准下的区分学说也因存在各种缺陷而不足以根本解决问题.我国未来制定民法典时,应当走出这些理论误区.
|
| 关 键 词： | 请求权 债权 实质一致性 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-7966(2006)05-0120-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-07-23 |
On the Theoretical Errors of the Relationship between the Claim and the Credit |
| |
| SONG Xu-ming. On the Theoretical Errors of the Relationship between the Claim and the Credit[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law, 2006, 0(5): 120-123 |
| |
| Authors: | SONG Xu-ming |
| |
| Affiliation: | SONG Xu-ming |
| |
| Abstract: | As to the confusion of "claim" and "credit" which is resulted from the substantially coincident definitions in German Civil Law,the traditional interpretation which takes them for not only substantially coincident but also the generalspecial relationship will lead to so much theoretic bepuzzlement.And the theories of differentiation basing on different criterions can not resolve this problem entirely because of their flaws.These theoretic errors should be avoided in our codification. |
| |
| Keywords: | claim credit substantially coincident |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
