| 美国法典1404(a)与非方便法院原则辨析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 牟笛. 美国法典1404(a)与非方便法院原则辨析[J]. 贵州警官职业学院学报, 2007, 19(4): 72-75 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 牟笛 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 武汉大学,国际法研究所,湖北,武汉,430071 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 由于美国法典28卷1404（a）条款的立法规定在功能与措辞上均非常类似普通法上的非方便法院原则，因此很多学者误以为该立法规定与非方便法院原则之间并不存在实质性的差异。然而，这一看法并不正确。事实上，1404（a）条款立法在法律效果、证明标准以及具体适用方面均与非方便法院原则存在显著的区别。
|
| 关 键 词： | 国际民事诉讼 28U.S.C.A.§1404(a) 非方便法院原则 |
| 文章编号： | 1671-5195(2007)04-0072-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007-04-20 |
An Analysis of the 1404(a) in the United States Code and the Doctrine of Forum Non Convenience |
| |
| MU Di. An Analysis of the 1404(a) in the United States Code and the Doctrine of Forum Non Convenience[J]. Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College, 2007, 19(4): 72-75 |
| |
| Authors: | MU Di |
| |
| Affiliation: | MU Di ( Research Institute of International Law, Wuhan Univeristy, Wuhan 430071, China ) |
| |
| Abstract: | Owing to the fact that the legislative function and wording of 28U.S.C.A§1404 （a）in United States Code resemble the doctrine of forum non convenience in common law, many scholars wrongly hold that this legislative regulation doesn＇t differ from the doctrine of forum non convenience in essence. Actually, there are marked differences between the item 1404 （a） and the doctrine of forum non convenience in the aspects such as legal effect, standards and concrete application. |
| |
| Keywords: | international civil litigation 28U.S.C.A§1404（a） doctrine of forum non convenience |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
