| 析无权处分的基本问题 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李鹃. 析无权处分的基本问题[J]. 山西警官高等专科学校学报, 2003, 11(3): 44-48 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李鹃 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山西警官高等专科学校,山西,太原,030021 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 自 1999年《中华人民共和国合同法》颁布以来 ,第 5 1条所确立的无权处分制度倍受争议。文章分析了无权处分的概念 ,划清了它与相关概念的区别 ,着重从立法体例上阐述了国外对无权处分制度的规定 ,评析了三种不同立法模式的优劣 ,指出债权形式主义的立法模式为我国未来立法模式的选择
|
| 关 键 词： | 无权处分 处分权 债权形式主义 物权形式主义 债权意思主义 |
| 文章编号： | 1671-685X(2003)03-0044-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2002-10-16 |
Analysing the Basic Problem of Unauthorized Disposition |
| |
| LI Juan. Analysing the Basic Problem of Unauthorized Disposition[J]. Journal of Shanxi Pollce Academy, 2003, 11(3): 44-48 |
| |
| Authors: | LI Juan |
| |
| Abstract: | Since the issue of Chinese Contract Law in 1999,there have been a lot of controversies over unauthorized disposition provided in Article 51. The author here analyses the concept of unauthorized disposition by comparing it with other related concepts and mainly discusses foreign regulations about unauthorized disposition from the legislation style.The advanteges and disadvantages of the three different models of legislation are discussed and it is pointed out that the legislative model of obligation formalism is the best choice for China. |
| |
| Keywords: | unauthorized disposition disposition obligation formalism real right formalism obligation autonomy of the will |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
