| 对所谓"债权物权化"的思考--以"买卖不破租赁"为例 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 章杰超. 对所谓"债权物权化"的思考--以"买卖不破租赁"为例[J]. 法学论坛, 2005, 20(5): 89-93 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 章杰超 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国政法大学民商经济法学院,北京,100088 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 买卖不破租赁可以说已经成为学术界和实务界的共识,也成为学者们提出或支持所谓债权物权化的主要依据.本文从对债权和物权的分析及对买卖和租赁的比较入手,通过还租赁以其本来面目来否定债权物权化这一命题,驳斥传统的观点.
|
| 关 键 词： | 买卖 租赁 债权 物权 |
| 文章编号： | 1009-8003(2005)05-0089-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-06-06 |
On "Making the Obligatory Right Turn to Have the Character of Real Right"--One Example:"Kauf bricht nicht Miete" |
| |
| ZHANG Jie-Chao. On "Making the Obligatory Right Turn to Have the Character of Real Right"--One Example:"Kauf bricht nicht Miete"[J]. Legal Forum, 2005, 20(5): 89-93 |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Jie-Chao |
| |
| Abstract: | "Kauf bricht nicht Miete" has not only been widely accepted by scholars and lawyers,but also been regarded as the basis of the theory of"making the obligatory right turn to have the character of real right".Firstly,this thesis analyses obligatory right and real right,compares sale with release.Then by making clear what release really is,it rebuts the theory of"making the obligatory right turn to have the character of real right" and the traditional viewpoint. |
| |
| Keywords: | trade tenancy real right obligatory right |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
