How campaigns promote the legitimacy of elections |
| |
Institution: | 1. MZES, University of Mannheim, Germany;2. Department of Political Science, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA;3. Politics, University of Manchester, United Kingdom;1. Aviation Studies, Bowling Green State University, 124 Williams Hall, Bowling Green, OH 43403, United States;2. Department of Political Science, Bowling Green State University, United States |
| |
Abstract: | Why do people see elections as fair or unfair? In prior accounts, evaluations of the election depend on people's candidate preferences, where supporters of the winning candidate tend to call the election fair while those on the losing side feel it was unfair. I argue that perceptions of election fairness reflect not just the election outcome, but also the campaign process. Using a set of multilevel models and data from the 1996–2004 American National Election Studies, I explore the consequences of campaign experiences in shaping people's evaluations of the fairness of a presidential election. I find that as campaign competition increases, people are less likely to translate their feelings about the candidates into their evaluations of the election. Rather than alienating citizens, competitive campaigns mitigate the effects of prior preferences in a way that promotes the legitimacy of elections. |
| |
Keywords: | Election fairness Legitimacy Competitiveness Presidential elections |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|