首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

功利与公正:刑事和解实践的理性反思
引用本文:姜金良,杜国伟. 功利与公正:刑事和解实践的理性反思[J]. 新疆警官高等专科学校学报, 2012, 32(2): 40-45
作者姓名:姜金良  杜国伟
作者单位:1. 扬州市中级人民法院刑事审判一庭,江苏扬州,225000
2. 中国人民大学法学院,北京,100038
摘    要:刑事和解在我国作为犯罪处置模式,具有公权力推进型的政策性导向,由于追求化解纠纷,办案效率等因素,在刑事和解实践适用中存在异化现象。权力机关主持刑事和解的主体多元化,强力促使当事人达成和解,与辩诉交易制度混淆,在刑事和解的案件适用范围上进行扩张,将刑事和解适用于重罪案件甚至作为控制死刑的手段。理性反思刑事和解实践中的异化形态,应将刑事和解通过法益原则在实体上进行限制,控制在侵犯个人法益轻罪范围内,程序上明确刑事和解的启动程序、和解内容、救济途径。

关 键 词:刑事和解  恢复性司法  辩诉交易  法益

Utility and Justice:Introspect on Application of Criminal Compromise
JIANG Jin-liang , DU Guo-wei. Utility and Justice:Introspect on Application of Criminal Compromise[J]. Journal of Xinj iang Police Officers’Academy, 2012, 32(2): 40-45
Authors:JIANG Jin-liang    DU Guo-wei
Affiliation:1.The Criminal Trial Court of Yangzhou Intermediate People’s Court,Yangzhou,Jiangsu 225000,China;2.Law School,Chinese People’s University,Beijing 10038,China)
Abstract:As a dealing mode of propulsion under the public right,the criminal compromise has some phenomena of overspreading and distorting the application of criminal compromise.The principal parts are complicated;The criminal agreement and defending bargain were garbled.The application range was expanded,and the principle was applied in some major cases,even as a means to control death penalty.Through reasonable introspect,the criminal compromise should be restricted by law and controlled in private legal benefit.In procedures,we should set up the systems of start,agreement contents and relieving path.
Keywords:criminal compromise  recovery judicatory  defending bargain  legal benefit
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号