| 否定之否定：刑事第三审程序质疑观点辨析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 牛振宇. 否定之否定：刑事第三审程序质疑观点辨析[J]. 时代法学, 2006, 4(3): 50-55 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 牛振宇 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 河南科技大学文法学院,河南,洛阳,471000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 关于中国建构刑事第三审程序的合理性,目前存在着不少质疑之声,主要有司法资源有限论、最高法院无力负担论、第三审程序无效论以及当事人滥用诉权论。实际上,这些观点要么过于武断,要么属于因噎废食,要么对刑事第三审程序的性质存在明显的误读。
|
| 关 键 词： | 第三审 司法资源 诉权 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-769X(2006)03-0050-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-03-26 |
Denial On Denial:Discriminate View of Oppugning Criminal Procedure of the Third Instance |
| |
| Niu Zhenyu. Denial On Denial:Discriminate View of Oppugning Criminal Procedure of the Third Instance[J]. Presentday Law Science, 2006, 4(3): 50-55 |
| |
| Authors: | Niu Zhenyu |
| |
| Abstract: | Should the criminal proceedings of the third instance be formed in China? Some persons don't agree, because they think that judicial resource is limited, the supreme court can't burden, the procedure will be of no effect, party maybe abuse suite right. In fact, such viewpoint is an arbitrary decision, or the character of the criminal proceedings of the third instance is comprehend by mistake. |
| |
| Keywords: | the third instance judicial resource suit right |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
