首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil: the unsightly Milosevic case
Authors:Tiphaine Dickson  Aleksandar Jokic
Affiliation:(1) Peris, Sutton & Dickson, 625 René-Levesque ouest, Suite 900, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3B 1R2;(2) Department of Philosophy, Portland State University, P.O. Box 751, Portland, OR 97207-0751, USA
Abstract:To ignore evil is to cause it to cease to exist, thought the ancients, and so, perhaps, think those who accuse former leaders of now dismembered countries, no longer in existence, of war crimes, and who would prevent those they accuse of raising the aggression which was committed against their country. Can the evil of aggression be willed out of existence if it goes unmentioned, and if international ad hoc bodies do not consider it a crime within their jurisdiction? And if the defendant is gagged, if judgments permit him to be removed from the courtroom altogether, will we be free from having to see and hear the evil he persistently identifies, and for which he points out there will be no justice? The Milosevic trial has been underreported to the point where “speaking evil” – that is, expressing criticism of the persistent procedural irregularities that have plagued the proceedings, and indeed the outright erosion of fair trial rights (heralded as “progress” in some quarters) – has become a demanding exercise. It is one we attempt here.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号