| 中外民事诉讼辩论原则比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李帅,谢彤. 中外民事诉讼辩论原则比较研究[J]. 广西政法管理干部学院学报, 2012, 0(1): 110-114 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李帅 谢彤 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京林业大学,北京,100083 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 辩论主义原则是我国进行民事案件辩论的法律依据。辩论原则已经成为了全世界大多数国家关注的一个法律焦点问题。我国对于辩论原则的规定很模糊，本文通过把我国的民事诉讼辩论原则与外国进行对比，从而提出一些有效的改善措施，最大限度地实现司法公正。
|
| 关 键 词： | 辩论原则 民事诉讼 证据 |
The lomparison of Chinese and Foreign Principles of Debate |
| |
| LI Shuai,XIE Tong. The lomparison of Chinese and Foreign Principles of Debate[J]. Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law, 2012, 0(1): 110-114 |
| |
| Authors: | LI Shuai XIE Tong |
| |
| Affiliation: | (Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083) |
| |
| Abstract: | The principle of the debate is China’s legal basis for civil action.Requirements for the principles of debate in China are very vague,and the principles of debate in most countries around the world have become concerned as a legal focus.In this paper,we compare our civil principles of the debate with foreign principles to propose some effective measures to achieve the justice of law. |
| |
| Keywords: | Adversary doctrine Civil Action Evidence |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
