司法能动主义基本问题研究

无论司法权的原始属性是什么。也不管孟德斯鸠是如何看待它的,在现代民族国家权力建构下,司法权都有两个基本属性,一个是技术的,一个是政治的,尽管在不同的国家这两个属性的比重有所差异。司法能动也就是朝着这两个方向能动,否则只能是乱动,司法能动主义的界定有两种基本的方式,一是传统的方式,一是完政史的视角。此外,司法能动主义与司法审查、司法之上等概念也有必要予以区分。

Some Analysis of the Basic Problem of Judicial Activism

No matter what the original characteristic of the judicial power is and regardless of Montesquieu is how to treat it, judicial power, constructed by the modem nation-state power ,has two basic properties, one is technical, the other is political, although in different countries the proportion of these two attributes are different. Judicial activism is moving towards in the direction of these two dimensions, or is out of tune. There are two basic ways of defining the judicial activism, one is the traditional way, the other is the perspective of the constitutional history. In addition, it is necessary to distinguish judicial activism from Judicial review, judicial suoremacy and so on.