首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论显失公平的构成要件
引用本文:张良. 论显失公平的构成要件[J]. 河南省政法管理干部学院学报, 2014, 29(6): 46-52
作者姓名:张良
作者单位:河南财经政法大学民商经济法学院,河南郑州,450002
基金项目:2014年度国家社会科学基金一般项目“不公平合同条款法律规制研究”的阶段性成果,2013年度教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“消费者合同研究——以《中华人民共和国消费者权益保护法》的修改为背景”的阶段性成果
摘    要:显失公平的实质是对合同效力的否定,体现了合同正义原则对合同自由原则的修正。显失公平的构成要件与交易的安全与判决的公正密切相关。以《德国民法典》、美国《统一商法典》、《国际商事合同通则》和《欧洲合同法原则》为代表的主流立法例及有关判例均采显失公平构成要件的二元说。由于我国法律规定的模糊性,权威学者在显失公平构成要件方面争议极大,两派学者势均力敌。比较法考察与法理分析表明,我国法中显失公平的构成要件应当包括主观要件和客观要件。

关 键 词:显失公平  构成要件  主观要件  客观要件

On the Constitutive Elements of Unconscionability
Zhang Liang. On the Constitutive Elements of Unconscionability[J]. Journal of Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law, 2014, 29(6): 46-52
Authors:Zhang Liang
Affiliation:Zhang Liang ( School of Civil and Commercial Law and Economic Law, Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou, Henan 450002 )
Abstract:Unconscionability is ciple of freedom of contract by safety and justice of judgment. denial of the validity of a contract, which the principle of justice of contract. This embodies the amendment to the prin- topic is closely related to transaction Leading legislations such as BGB, UCC, PICC and PECL and relative judicial precedents consider that unconscionability constitutes both subjective elements and objective elements. Because of the vagueness in the relative law, Chinese authoritative scholars, whose two sides are evenly matched, argue heatedly about the constitutive elements of unconscionability. Examinations of comparative laws and analyses of legal principle demonstrate that unconscionability should constitute both subjective elements and objective ele- ments in Chinese law.
Keywords:constitutive elements  subjective element  objective element
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号