首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论民事诉讼中自由证明的构建
引用本文:李潇潇. 论民事诉讼中自由证明的构建[J]. 河南省政法管理干部学院学报, 2014, 29(6): 142-151
作者姓名:李潇潇
作者单位:北京大学法学院,北京,100871
摘    要:自由证明作为与严格证明相对立的一种证明模式,体现了根据不同待证事实的特性采用不同证明方式的诉讼分流理念及价值,并已在较多国家得到广泛确立和适用。而我国目前的民事诉讼证明制度中尚未确立这一证明模式,理论界更是未对其引起足够的重视和研究,这就极大地限制了我国民事诉讼中证明制度的体系化和多元化构建。如何在我国民事诉讼的证明制度中合理构建自由证明制度,使其在证明待证事实中发挥自身应有的优势,逐步实现我国民事诉讼证明制度的体系化和多元化构建,从而为法院合理有效地认定待证事实提供一个更为高效、公正的制度环境是值得研究和探讨的问题。

关 键 词:自由证明  严格证明  证据方法  证据调查程序

On the Construction of Free Proof in Civil Litigation
Li Xiaoxiao. On the Construction of Free Proof in Civil Litigation[J]. Journal of Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law, 2014, 29(6): 142-151
Authors:Li Xiaoxiao
Affiliation:Li Xiaoxiao ( Law School, Peking University, Beijing 100871 )
Abstract:Free proof is a proof as opposed to strict proof,which has litigation division concept and value that according to the different characteristics of the facts to be proved using different proof, and has been widely used in many countries. While China' s civil litigation proof model has not yet been established this proof sys- tem, there is not enough attention and research in theory, which greatly limits the construction of system and di- versified proof system in the civil action in China. It is an issue worth studying and exploring about how to build a rational system of free proof in civil litigation proof system, to make it play its due advantages when proofing the facts to be proved, to gradually realize the system and diversified construction of China' s civil liti- gation proof system, thus providing the court a more efficient system environment that can effectively identify the facts to be proved.
Keywords:free proof  strict proof  evidence method  evidence investigation procedure
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号