| 刑事诉讼中法官对证据裁判的自由与不自由 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吴立德. 刑事诉讼中法官对证据裁判的自由与不自由[J]. 法律科学, 2001, 0(3): 86-90 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吴立德 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南京师范大学法律系!江苏南京210097 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 证据裁判主义是现代诉讼的理性选择 ,证据裁判中自由与不自由的背反冲突构成裁判者整个证据裁判的矛盾过程。遵循证据裁判的运行机理和特征 ,形式理性为认知理性的裁判自由意志界限。认知理性和形式理性的交涉性互动是自由与不自由的冲突内涵 ,同时认知理性和形式理性的交涉性互动是裁判机制合理运作的必然要求
|
| 关 键 词： | 裁判自由意志 证据能力 证明力 形式理性 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-5307(2001)03-0086-(05) |
| 修稿时间： | 2000-12-07 |
The Free and Limited Adjudication Though Evidence for Judicators in Criminal Lawsuit |
| |
| WU Li-de. The Free and Limited Adjudication Though Evidence for Judicators in Criminal Lawsuit[J]. Law Science (Journal of Northwest Institute University of Politics and Law), 2001, 0(3): 86-90 |
| |
| Authors: | WU Li-de |
| |
| Abstract: | The principle to adjudicate through evidences is the rational choise in modern lawsuit.The conflict between free and limitted adjudication through evidences constitutes the contradictary process of the adjudication through evidences for judicators.Abiding by the machanism and characteristics of adjudication through evidences,the paper assumes that formal rationalism is the limit for free adjudication of cognitive rationalism,and believes that the interaction between cognitive rationalism and formal rationalism is the intension of the conflict,and at the same time,the interaction is the necessary demand for the reasonable operation of adjudication mechanism. |
| |
| Keywords: | Discretion Credibility Evidential Effect Formal Rationalism |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
