| 德曼与布鲁姆解构阅读法之比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 罗杰鹦. 德曼与布鲁姆解构阅读法之比较[J]. 思想战线, 2004, 30(1): 60-64 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 罗杰鹦 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 浙江工业大学,外国语学院,浙江,杭州,310032 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 浙江省教育厅社科项目(省教1-2000193) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 德曼的解构阅读理论否定文学批评的人文层面,而布鲁姆则高度重视文学批评的人文品质,主张在误读论中融入人的主观心理因素,这是他们最大的不同点,但对文本意义不确定性的观点,则是耶鲁学派的共同特征。
|
| 关 键 词： | 解构阅读 修辞阅读 互文阅读 误读 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-778X(2004)01-0060-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003-03-21 |
A Comparison of the Deconstructive Reading between Paul de Man and Bloom |
| |
| LUO Jie-ying. A Comparison of the Deconstructive Reading between Paul de Man and Bloom[J]. The Ideological Front(Yunnan University's Journal of Social Sciences), 2004, 30(1): 60-64 |
| |
| Authors: | LUO Jie-ying |
| |
| Abstract: | Paul de Man's deconstructive theory of reading negates the humane dimension of literary criticism to which Harold Bloom attaches great importance.Moreover, Bloom advocates the consideration of human's personal factors in misreading theory. However, the idea of the uncertainty of literary meaning is generally held by the Yale Group. |
| |
| Keywords: | deconstructive reading rhetorical reading inter-reading misreading |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
