| “不当影响”刍议－合同法公平原则的利益解读 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 龙陈.“不当影响”刍议－合同法公平原则的利益解读[J].广西政法管理干部学院学报,2003,18(1):39-42. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 龙陈 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湘潭大学法学院,湖南,湘潭,411105 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国合同法对"不当影响"制度的阙失,造成法律适用遇到困局,解决的途径是通过对合同法公平原则的扩张解释予以涵盖,借助法律类推来解决.本文通过对该制度的制度层面分析,论述了其独立存在的价值,通过对公平原则的利益诠释,从该制度构成对契约自由的挑战与维护的双向维度,揭示出追求社会利益最大化是现代民法的动机与内在作用机理.
|
| 关 键 词： | 不当影响 契约自由 契约公正 利益平衡 社会利益最大化 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-8628(2003)01-0039-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2002年8月20日 |
Opinions on "Unseemly Effect"--Principle of Justice in Contract Law |
| |
| LONG Chen.Opinions on "Unseemly Effect"--Principle of Justice in Contract Law[J].Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law,2003,18(1):39-42. |
| |
| Authors: | LONG Chen |
| |
| Abstract: | The lack of "unseemly effect" in Contract Law in China causes the difficulties in the application of laws. The solution is to extend the explanation on the principle of justice and ask legal analogy for help. With analysis on the system, the thesis tells the value of its independent existence. And with explanations on the principle of justice, the thesis mentions both the challenge and protection of the system to the contractual freedom and unveils that pursuit for maximum of social benefits is the motivation and internal functional mechanism of modern civil laws. |
| |
| Keywords: | unseemly effect contractual freedom contractual justice benefit balance maximum of social benefits |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
