| 论预期违约制度 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 唐世银,胡志斌. 论预期违约制度[J]. 安徽警官职业学院学报, 2002, 1(3): 43-45. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5101.2002.03.014 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 唐世银 胡志斌 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 安徽大学,法学院,安徽,合肥,230039 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国<合同法>借鉴了英美法的预期违约制度,在第108条规定了预期违约制度.本文拟就预期违约的两种具体形态即明示预期违约和默示预期违约、它们的历史起源、构成要件、法律救济、相互区别、与不安抗辩权的关系及该制度存在的合理性和必要性作一系统的探讨,并就有关问题提出了自己的看法,以期裨益于对这一制度的理解和运用.
|
| 关 键 词： | 明示预期违约 默示预期违约 不安抗辩权 理论说明 |
| 文章编号： | 1671-5101(2002)03-0043-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2002-05-29 |
On Anticipatory Breach System |
| |
| Tang Shiyin,Hu Zhibin. On Anticipatory Breach System[J]. Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Pollce Officers, 2002, 1(3): 43-45. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5101.2002.03.014 |
| |
| Authors: | Tang Shiyin Hu Zhibin |
| |
| Abstract: | Anticipatory breach of contract was borrowed and absorbed by The law of Contract of China. It was stipulated in No. 108 article of the law. In this essay, the author will discuss repudiation and diminished expectation, their historical origins, composing factors, relief of law, mutual difference, the relation between repudiation and unpeaceful right of pleadings and the rationality and necessity for the establishment of this system, hoping that this system will be understood thoroughly and put into practice properly. |
| |
| Keywords: | Repudiation Diminished Expectation Unpeaceful Right of Pleading Theory Proof |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
