| 非法证据排除规则的理论误区与规则重构 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 马贵翔,倪泽仁. 非法证据排除规则的理论误区与规则重构[J]. 国家检察官学院学报, 2002, 10(1): 74-77,84 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 马贵翔 倪泽仁 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 浙江省杭州,商学院,浙江,杭州,310035
2. 国家检察官学院,北京,100041 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 非法证据排除规则忽视了诉讼结构加工信息的特有功能 ,证据具有的自在性、必然发现性以及公用性使得非法方法不能作为断送证据“前途”的合理理由 ,考虑到公民无权把隐私权和沉默权作为隐藏犯罪证据的手段 ,建议引入非法与合法事后证明规则以及收集证据人员的取证风险选择权
|
| 关 键 词： | 非法证据 排除规则 诉讼结构 事后证明 风险选择 |
| 文章编号： | 1004-9428(2002)01-0074-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2001-12-06 |
Misapprehension and Reconstruction of the Exclusion Rule of Illegal Evidence |
| |
| MA Gui xiang ,NI Ze ren. Misapprehension and Reconstruction of the Exclusion Rule of Illegal Evidence[J]. journal of national prosecutors college, 2002, 10(1): 74-77,84 |
| |
| Authors: | MA Gui xiang NI Ze ren |
| |
| Affiliation: | MA Gui xiang 1,NI Ze ren 2 |
| |
| Abstract: | The exclusion rule of illegal evidence overlooks the unique function of court trials,i.e.,producing information.The objectivity,discoverability and obtainability of evidence make illegal evidence cannot simply be justifiably inadmissible.Considering that an individual is not entitled to conceal evidence by virtue of his rights of privacy and silence,it is suggested that a rule concerning the legality proof and the right of risk choices of judicial personnel should be introduced. |
| |
| Keywords: | illegal evidence the exclusion rule afterwards proof the right of risk choices |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
