首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论故意与过失的界限
引用本文:郭莉. 论故意与过失的界限[J]. 河南公安高等专科学校学报, 2009, 18(3): 29-32
作者姓名:郭莉
作者单位:中国人民大学,法学院,中国,北京,100872
摘    要:我国传统刑法理论将意志因素作为区分故意和过失的要素之一其实并不正确,事实上,真正可作为故意与过失分界要素的是认识因素和意欲因素。在直接故意与间接故意的区分中,欲的要素更具决定性。而间接故意与有认识过失的分界,用综合的观点全面考察更为合理可行。轻信过失与疏忽过失的最大区别则在于行为人有无认识,这里认识要素成了区分的关键。

关 键 词:故意  过失  认识因素  意欲因素

The Boundary of Intention and Negligence
GUO Li. The Boundary of Intention and Negligence[J]. Journal of Henan Public Security Academy, 2009, 18(3): 29-32
Authors:GUO Li
Affiliation:GUO Li (Law school of People' s University, Beijing China 100872)
Abstract:It is not true to differentiate between intention and negligence by will factor in China traditional criminal theory.Fac-tually,the element of cognition and conation are the standard boundaries.The conation is more decisive in the difference of intent and knowledge.It is more reasonable and practical to separate recklessness from knowledge through comprehensive survey.The most important difference of recklessness and negligence lies in whether the actor has recognized the event and future effect.The cogniti...
Keywords:Intention  Negligence  Cognitive element  Conation element  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号