| 论ICSID仲裁庭对视为外国法人管辖权的扩张 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 鲁少军. 论ICSID仲裁庭对视为外国法人管辖权的扩张[J]. 黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报, 2009, 0(6) |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 鲁少军 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西北政法大学,西安,710063 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 国际投资争端仲裁管辖权是解决投资争端国际中心机制的重要内容,是"中心"仲裁庭进行仲裁的前提条件,具有重要的实践和理论意义。对于视为外国国民投资者管辖权问题,《公约》规定的较为模糊和弹性,近年来,"中心"做扩大解释,导致与此相关的仲裁实践中出现扩张性管辖案例,直接挑战"中心"现有的运行机制,这种扩展性管辖在南美等一些国家甚至有泛滥的趋势,对发展中国家经济发展带来极大负面效应。深入剖析和评价这一现象,并提出我国的应对策略,具有重要的现实意义。
|
| 关 键 词： | 外国法人 国籍 外国控制 同意管辖 |
Jurisdiction Expansion of ICSID Arbitration Court Regarding as Foreign Body Corporate |
| |
| LU Shao-jun. Jurisdiction Expansion of ICSID Arbitration Court Regarding as Foreign Body Corporate[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law, 2009, 0(6) |
| |
| Authors: | LU Shao-jun |
| |
| Affiliation: | LU Shao-jun; |
| |
| Abstract: | The jurisdiction of international investment dispute arbitration is important content of the mechanism ofthe International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes(i.e.center),is also the premise condition of the center arbitration court,and it has important practical and theoretical significance.Regarding regards as foreign national investor jurisdiction,Conventional stipulation is vague and elastic.In recent years,Centre makes an expanded explanation,This phenomenon directly challenges the existing op... |
| |
| Keywords: | foreign body corporate nationality foreign control agreement jurisdiction |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
