| 论民事诉讼立案审查制度 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 宋旺兴. 论民事诉讼立案审查制度[J]. 西南政法大学学报, 2008, 10(2): 83-90 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 宋旺兴 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 武汉大学,法学院,湖北,武汉,430072 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在民事诉讼中,对于当事人的起诉,国外大多数国家实行立案登记制度,我国实行程序审查和实体审查相结合的立案审查制度。这种制度存在很多弊端,有人主张废除该制度,实行立案登记制度。这种观点值得商榷,对现行程序审查和实体审查相结合的立案审查制度进行改良而不是全盘否定,似乎更符合我国的国情。
|
| 关 键 词： | 立案登记 立案审查 程序审查 实体审查 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-2397(2008)02-0083-08 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007-04-15 |
On Censorship of Accreditation in Civil Proceedings |
| |
| SONG Wang-xing. On Censorship of Accreditation in Civil Proceedings[J]. Journal of Swupl, 2008, 10(2): 83-90 |
| |
| Authors: | SONG Wang-xing |
| |
| Affiliation: | SONG Wang-xing (Law School, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | In civil proceedings, as to prosecution, most foreign countries adopt registration system, while China implements censorship of accreditation, which associates procedural review with substantial review. Owning to a good deal of disadvantages in the system in China, someone advocates replacing censorship of accreditation by registration system. Nevertheless, this theory cannot hold water. Considering the situation of China, it is more appropriate to improve the present censorship of accreditation. |
| |
| Keywords: | registration of accreditation censorship of accreditation procedural review substantial review |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
