论刑法中危害行为的有意性特征

刑法中危害行为的概念应舍弃意思要素,是近年来部分学者提出的一种颇有影响的观点。本文对该观点所依据的几点理由进行了分析,认为有意性仍然是刑法中危害行为的必然要素,并将刑法中危害行为的有意性与作为犯罪构成主观要件的故意与过失区别开来,认为危害行为的有意性是指行为人对其行为本身所持有的心理态度,而作为犯罪构成主观要件的故意与过失是指行为人对其行为引起的危害结果所持有的心理态度,二者在内容、性质、功能以及法律后果等四方面存有显著的区别。此外,本文还对二者在司法实践中的表现形式进行了归纳分类。

The Intention-Character of Actus Reus in the Criminal Law

That the element of intention should be excluded bo the nOtion of actus reus in the criminal law is a prevailing viewpoint put forward by some scholars in recent year. By analyzing the grounds of this viewpoint, this paper holds that intention is still the inevitable element of actus reus in the criminal law and that intention is different from deliberation and involuntariness which form the sub- jective ingredients of crime in that the former indicates the attitudes of the action - doer has towards the action itself, while the latter indicates the attitudes the action - doer has towards the harmful results caused by his action. They differ in content, nature, function and legal consequences. In addition the paper classifies their manifestations in the judicial practice.