"非典"心理意义的性别比较

本研究采用联想组合分析法,比较了“非典”一词在“非典”期间对男女大学生的心理意义,受试为京、沪、穗、港、台520名大学生。结果发现,男性的非典视角以“病”为中心,重“硬”信息,重群体控制和治疗;女性的非典视角以“人”为中心,重“软”信息,重个人预防。在主观反应中,男性的负面情绪联想高于女性;女性的负面判断联想高于男性。这些结果与以往应激反应中“脆弱性”的性别差异研究有所不同,可从社会性别视角加以解释。

A Gender Comparison of the Psychological Meaning of "SARS"

This research adopts the method of associative combination analysis using the term "SARS" to compare college boys with college girls in terms of psychological meaning, with 520 college students from Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Hong Kong and Taiwan participating. Results: Boys' SARS perspective focused on "disease,", on "hard" information and on group control and treatment, while girls' SARS perspective focused on "people," on "soft" information and on personal prevention. In subjective response, boys'negative mood association was higher than girls', while girls' negative judgement association was higher than boys'. These results are unlike the previous research on gender difference in terms of the "fragility" in contingency response, and this can be explained from gender perspective.