首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

关于假冒商标案件中商品真伪的判断
引用本文:王小林,曹柯. 关于假冒商标案件中商品真伪的判断[J]. 西南政法大学学报, 2006, 8(5): 50-53
作者姓名:王小林  曹柯
作者单位:重庆市第一中级人民法院,重庆,400012
摘    要:假冒商标行为是侵犯注册商标专用权最为严重的行为之一。司法实践中,假冒商标商品的生产行为往往比较隐蔽,注册商标权人难以直接起诉生产厂家,只能起诉销售商销售假冒注册商标商品的行为。但由于生产厂家没有参加诉讼,导致双方当事人对被诉商品是否假冒容易产生争议。以往的审判中,认定商品真伪多采用鉴定比较的方法,但在大量商品没有使用防伪标记或者只使用了简单防伪标记的情况下,使用鉴定比较法不能作出正确判断。关于商品真伪的判断,还是应当从商标的本意出发,要求当事人证明被诉商品的来源。

关 键 词:假冒商标  商品真伪  举证责任
文章编号:1008-4355(2006)05-0050-04
修稿时间:2006-06-27

On Identifying the Authenticity of Commodity in the Trademark Infringement
WANG Xiao-lin,CAO Ke. On Identifying the Authenticity of Commodity in the Trademark Infringement[J]. Journal of Swupl, 2006, 8(5): 50-53
Authors:WANG Xiao-lin  CAO Ke
Abstract:Trademark counterfeiting is the most serious crime in infringing the right-holder's rights of registered trademarks.In juridical practice,it is easy to conceal the production of the shoddy products;it follows that the trademark registrant cannot take the production factories to law directly,but litigates a claim against the seller's crimes of sale of fake commodities.Due to the absence of the production factories in litigation,both parties are likely to dispute on the authenticity of the commodities.In the previous trails,the commodity's authenticity was distinguished by comparison.However,most of the commodities have a simple anti-fake goods label or have no such labels at all,which causes the method of comparison unreliable.To distinguish the shoddy products,the original intention of the trademark should be understood,and the party should prove the source of goods.
Keywords:trademark counterfeiting  the authenticity of commodities  burden of proof  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号