| 论欧洲人权法院的非法证据排除 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘国庆,汪枫. 论欧洲人权法院的非法证据排除[J]. 西南政法大学学报, 2013, 15(4): 12-19 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘国庆 汪枫 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 韩山师范学院政法系,广东潮州,521041
2. 北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院,北京,100875 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 欧洲人权法院对于非法证据的处理有其特色,与英美法国家迥然不同.欧洲人权法院并没有就如何排除非法证据制定系列指导性的纲要,而是采取个案中具体考量,重点考察的是公权力人员的非法取证行为是否给整个诉讼程序造成不公以及所获证据与案件的关联性,并在此基础上决定证据排除与否,这一点值得关注.
|
| 关 键 词： | 关联性 可采性 非法证据 衍生证据 隐私权 |
On the Exclusion of Evidence Obtained Illegally of European Court of Human Rights |
| |
| LIU Guo-qing , WANG Feng. On the Exclusion of Evidence Obtained Illegally of European Court of Human Rights[J]. Journal of Swupl, 2013, 15(4): 12-19 |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Guo-qing WANG Feng |
| |
| Affiliation: | 2 (1. Politics and Law Department, Hanshan Normal University, Chaozhou 521041 ; College for Criminal Law Science of Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | European Court of human rights has its own characteristics as for the treatment of illegal evi- dence, which is different from Anglo-American countries. European Court of human rights doesn＇ t make a se- ries of guiding outlines with reference to the exclusion of evidence obtained illegally ; however, it adopts an ap- proach of considering case-by-case, which attaches much importance to the two key factors ： the fairness of pro- cedure as a whole and the relevance of evidence. On the basis of that, the judges are determined whether the evidences obtained illegally are excluded or not, and is worthy of attention. |
| |
| Keywords: | relevance admissibility of evidence illegal evidence derivative evidence the rights of pri- vacy |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
