首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论民事诉讼中的心证公开
引用本文:赵信会. 论民事诉讼中的心证公开[J]. 河南省政法管理干部学院学报, 2005, 20(5): 107-112
作者姓名:赵信会
作者单位:西南政法大学,法学院,重庆,430001
摘    要:《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》(以下简称《证据规定》)初步确立了我国的心证公开制度,心证公开的程序价值表现为两个方面:一、心证公开是自由心证的客观化机制;二、心证公开是辩论主义的补充并与阐明制度、判决理由的论证制度相连接。《证据规定》规定的判决理由的论证制度,在内容上还存在不完善、不科学之处;《证据规定》确立的阐明制度尚不彻底。要实现心证公开制度的制度功能,必须进一步完善《证据规定》中判决理由的论证制度和阐明制度。

关 键 词:心证公开  判决理由的论证  阐明权  举证时限
文章编号:1008-6951(2005)05-0107-06
修稿时间:2005-06-20

On the Publicity of the Discretionary Evaluation in Civil Action
Zhao Xinhui. On the Publicity of the Discretionary Evaluation in Civil Action[J]. Journal of Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law, 2005, 20(5): 107-112
Authors:Zhao Xinhui
Abstract:Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on the Evidence for Civil Action primarily establishes our system of discretionary evaluation,but the writer think the procedural value of discretionary evaluation is manifested in two aspects: one is that the publicity of discretionary evaluation is the objective mechanism of discretionary evaluation;the other is that the publicity of discretionary evaluation is the supplement of adversary system and it is connected with the explanation system and the argumentation system of grounds of decision.So,to realize the function of the publicity of the discretionary evaluation,we must further improve the argumentation system of grounds of decision and explanation system in Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on the Evidence for Civil Action.
Keywords:publicity of discretionary evaluation  argumentation of grounds of decision  right of explanation  time limit of proof
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号