评公法与私法区别的必要及其根据

公私法区别的必要及其根据是公私法关系问题的出发点与立论基础。美浓部达吉认为公法与私法区别的必要性在于二者区分的"法律效果",根据在于实定的国家法能够区分为"本来的国家法"与"第二次的国家法";但是他的论证逻辑似乎有倒果为因的嫌疑。美浓部达吉批判了凯尔森否认公私法区别之必要性的观点,但是实际上他对凯尔森的解读与批判并未切中凯尔森观点的要害,因而是不太确当的。公私法之区别只是一种类型化的思考问题的方式,二者"有必要区分但是没有绝对的标准"。

Comment on the Necessity and Grounds of the Differentiation between Public Law and Private Law

The necessity and grounds of the differentiation between public law and private law is the starting point and foundation of this theme.Minobe tatsukichi thinks that the necessity rests with the "legal results" while the grounds consist in the differentiation between "senior state law" and "junior state law",but his reasoning logic seems reverse cause and effect.Minobe tatsukichi criticizes Hans Kelsen's opposite opinion nevertheless his criticism seems not to the points because his unfaithful unscrambling.The differentiation between public law and private law is just a kind of generic thinking mode and there is necessity of differentiation while no absolute criteria.