首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论抽象行政行为侵权
引用本文:王世涛. 论抽象行政行为侵权[J]. 行政与法, 2004, 0(10): 59-61
作者姓名:王世涛
作者单位:中国人民大学,财政金融学院,北京,100872
基金项目:辽宁省社会科学基金项目《依法行政专题研究》的阶段性成果。
摘    要:通过对抽象行政行为责任监督(事后监督)会一定程度上弥补制度监督(事前监督)的不足,违法的抽象行政行为应承担行政侵权责任。抽象行政行为构成侵权要求该抽象行政行为必须有效并被确认违法,且必须有具体的特定的损害事实。在认定抽象行政行为与损害结果的因果联系时,需要考察两者之间是否具有内在的联系,具体来说,看规范性文件的具体规定的内容与损害结果之间是否具有一致性。

关 键 词:抽象行政行为  侵权
文章编号:1007-8207(2004)10-0059-03
修稿时间:2004-04-10

On the Infringement of Abstract Administrative Action
Wang Shi-taoAbstract:The duty supervision for the. On the Infringement of Abstract Administrative Action[J]. Public Administration & Law, 2004, 0(10): 59-61
Authors:Wang Shi-taoAbstract:The duty supervision for the
Affiliation:Wang Shi-taoAbstract:The duty supervision for the
Abstract:administrative action may make up to a certain extent the in sufficiency of the system supervision.Illegal abstract administrative action should bear responsibility of administrative.The infringement of abstract administrative action is formed in condition that the action is effective and is affirmed law -breaking,as well as that there is specific and certain damage fact.It is necessary to examine whether there is inner link between them if the cause and effect relation between the actio and the damage result is affirmed.
Keywords:Abstract administrative action  infringement
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号