首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

民事再审新证据的认定与运用
引用本文:罗飞云.民事再审新证据的认定与运用[J].法律科学,2011(5):161-171.
作者姓名:罗飞云
作者单位:扬州大学法学院,江苏扬州225009
基金项目:最高人民法院2009年度重点调研课题:“关于再审新证据的认定及运用问题的调研”(GFZDKT0907)
摘    要:考察司法实践中再审新证据的运行特点和基本样态,可以发现我国法院对再审新证据比较宽容的总体现状。以新证据启动再审,有利于在发现真实的基础上实现实体公正,大陆法系各国一般都在一定限度内把新证据作为再审事由。我国目前严格限定再审新证据的种类还缺乏现实基础,但也不能过于放宽再审新证据的范围,再审新证据的认定与运用必须在既判力与实体公正之间进行权衡的基础上完善相关制度。

关 键 词:新证据  举证期限  既判力  实体公正

The Identification and Application of New Evidence in Retrial Judicial Practice
Luo Feiyun.The Identification and Application of New Evidence in Retrial Judicial Practice[J].Law Science (Journal of Northwest Institute University of Politics and Law),2011(5):161-171.
Authors:Luo Feiyun
Abstract:Through the interrogation on the operating characteristics and basic pattern of new evidence in the retrial judicial practice,the court's tolerant attitude to retrial new evidence might be found.Starting retrial via the new evidence is benefit to the achievement of substantive justice on the basis of discovering the reality.Generally,the civil law countries provide the new evidence as a retrial reason within some limits.Strictly limiting the kinds of new evidence in the retrial procedure is lack of realistic basis at present.but the scope of new evidence can not be too relaxed in the retrial,the identification and application of new evidence in the retrial procedure must balance relationship between res judicata and substantive justice.
Keywords:new evidence  time limit for producing evidence  res judicata  substantive justice
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号