网络信息安全犯罪的定量评价困境和突围路径——大数据背景下网络信息量化标准的反思和重构

刑法对网络安全的保护立场，正由网络运行安全转向网络信息安全。刑事立法更新不断增设网络信息安全专属罪名的同时，刑事司法的定量评价体系却未能一体构建，成为网络安全刑法保护的薄弱环节。当前网络信息安全犯罪的定量评价体系缺乏明确的逻辑主线，同时适用错位的“传统法益侵害程度”量化标准和模糊的“数据规模”新型量化标准，无法满足网络信息安全专属罪名司法适用的准确性和统一性需求，导致了司法适用的困境。消弭规范和技术之间的差异，以“信息规模”为定量评价核心的基础上，建构信息价值的分层评价模型，并将“组信息”作为基础的数据规模计量单位，是大数据时代背景下，突破网络信息安全犯罪司法定量评价困境的合理路径。

The Quantitative Evaluation Dilemma and the Breakout Path of the Crime of Network Information Security——Reflection and Reconstruction of the Quantitative Standard of Network Information in the Big-Data Era

Currently, the protection status of criminal law protecting the Internet securityis transforming from the operation security of the network to the information security. At the same time of increasing specific crimes for network information security in the updating of criminal legislature, the criminal justice has failed to build integrated quantitative evaluation systems, which become a weak area in the criminal protection for network security. The current quantitative evaluation system of the crime of network information security lacks clear logic mainline, and still uses the dislocated quantitative standard of “traditional legal interest degree” and blurred new quantitative standard of “data scale”, which is unable to meet the requirements of accuracy and the uniformity of the judicial application of specific crimes of network information security, resulting in the judicial dilemma. Eliminating the difference of regulations and technologies, based on the quantitative evaluation as a core, constructing the hierarchical evaluation model of the value of information，and setting the “group information”as a measuring unit, will lead to the rational path of break through the Quantitative Evaluation Dilemma of the crime of network information security in the historical big-data era.