Flourishing children,flourishing adults: families,equality and the neutralism-perfectionism debate |
| |
Authors: | Christine Sypnowich |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Philosophy, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canadachristine.sypnowich@queensu.ca |
| |
Abstract: | AbstractPolitical philosophers are divided on the question of whether society should guide individuals in their projects and goals in light of the competing, yet overlapping, values of moral independence and human well-being. The lively neutralism-perfectionism debate appears to be significantly muted, however, when it comes to children who, all parties assume, should be guided by adults in their plans of life. Thus, in their stimulating new book, Family Values: the Ethics of Parent-Child Relationships, liberals Harry Brighouse and Adam Swift affirm the role of the family in directing and enabling children’s flourishing. My paper challenges this distinction between parents and children in the liberal position to argue that the idea that it is appropriate to direct children to enable them to flourish, entails in fact, a commitment to policies that promote and enable the flourishing of all. |
| |
Keywords: | Family children flourishing perfectionism neutrality equality |
|
|