首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

刑事审前司法审查制度构建论纲——《刑事诉讼法》再修改背景下的期待与言说
引用本文:陈海平. 刑事审前司法审查制度构建论纲——《刑事诉讼法》再修改背景下的期待与言说[J]. 贵州警官职业学院学报, 2005, 17(1): 37-42,51
作者姓名:陈海平
作者单位:燕山大学,文法学院,河北,秦皇岛,066004
摘    要:司法审查机制在我国刑事诉讼审前程序中的缺位造成我国刑事诉讼的重大结构性缺陷,基于对审前程序中侦控权力运行的制约、为被追诉者提供有效的司法救济以及与国际接轨的考虑,审前司法审查制度的构建应为我国刑事审前程序改革的方向之一;审前司法审查的效力范围应当限定为有关强制性措施的适用和审查起诉行为;司法审查之主体应为人民法院,作为司法机关的我国人民检察院并不能担当司法审查之职能;司法审查方式可采取事先司法授权和事后司法救济的结合;其具体程序可按照司法授权程序、司法救济程序和公诉审查程序分别设计;此外,为实现人权保障和犯罪追究的协调统一,司法审查相应例外规则的确立也尤为必要.

关 键 词:刑事诉讼法  刑事审前程序  司法审查程序
文章编号:1671-5195(2005)01-0037-06
修稿时间:2004-11-08

On the Up-building of Criminal Pretrial Review System in China--Expectation under the Revision of the Criminal Procedure Law
CHEN Hai-ping. On the Up-building of Criminal Pretrial Review System in China--Expectation under the Revision of the Criminal Procedure Law[J]. Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College, 2005, 17(1): 37-42,51
Authors:CHEN Hai-ping
Abstract:The vacant of justice review in criminal pretrial procedure creates a great structure defect in criminal proceedings. During the reformation of criminal pretrial procedure, the up-building of criminal pretrial review system should be one of the basic directions. The review items should be confined to the relevant empowerment of forced measure and the review prosecution; Selects the people's court as the judge, and chooses the combination of the judicial empowerment in advance with the judicial succor afterwards in the justice review method; Tends to divide the concrete proceedings into judicial administration,judicial remedy and the indictment review. Furthermore, it is necessary to establish the exception rules.
Keywords:Criminal Procedure Law  criminal pretrial procedure  procedure of justice review
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号