首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

财团抵押与浮动抵押之比较
引用本文:戴谋富. 财团抵押与浮动抵押之比较[J]. 福建政法管理干部学院学报, 2001, 0(4): 40-43
作者姓名:戴谋富
作者单位:湖南师范大学法学院,湖南,长沙,410081
摘    要:财团抵押制度是大陆法系国家创制的以企业特定的集合财产为抵押的一种担保制度 ,浮动抵押是英美法系国家创制的以企业可自由流转的集合财产为抵押的一种担保制度 ,两者都是以企业集合财产设立的抵押制度 ,却存不同特征 ,各有利弊。文章通过对两者之比较认为 ,在我国担保体系中 ,财团抵押与浮动抵押均有其存在的价值 ,我国未来《物权法》应采取两者并存的立法方略 ,并就此对梁慧星先生领导的物权法研究课题组的相关草案建议稿进行分析评价。

关 键 词:财团抵押  浮动抵押  比较  立法
文章编号:1009-9093(2001)04-0040-04
修稿时间:2001-06-18

The Comparison of consortium charge with Floating charge
Dai Moufu. The Comparison of consortium charge with Floating charge[J]. The Journal of Fujian Institute of Political Science & Law, 2001, 0(4): 40-43
Authors:Dai Moufu
Abstract:Consortium Charge is a kind of guarantee created in the countries of Continental Law System which is setup with specially appointed group property of enterprise.Floating charge is a kind of guarantee creatde in the countries of Anglo -American Law System which is set up with floating group property of enterprise.They both are set up with group prooerty of enterprise but they have different characters and each has its merits and derierits.The article compares the mand thinks that Consortium Charge and Floating Charge both have its value in the system of guarantee and both should be adopted in the jusrerem of our country.Then the article analyzes and evaluates The Advice Draft of Chinese Jus Rerem drawn up by the Group studied on the Questions of chinese Jus Rerem which wasled by genthle man Liang Huixing.
Keywords:Consortium Charge  Floating Charge  Compare  Legislate
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号