National liberation and the conflicting terms of discourse in South Africa: An interpretation |
| |
Authors: | Philip Schlesinger |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Professor of Film and Media Studies and Director of the Stirling Media Research Institute, University of Stirling;2. Professor of Media and Communication at the University of Oslo. |
| |
Abstract: | Abstract Underlying the moves and countermoves of the current communal conflict in South Africa is a struggle to control the meanings of the key terms of discourse—race, nation, apartheid and socialism—by which the conflict is characterized within and outside the country. Although no definition, therefore, of any of these terms can escape politicization, there is a case, historically and with a view to a negotiated settlement, for having apartheid, the most emotion‐laden of these terms, limited to post‐1948 doctrine and practice. The foundation for a negotiated settlement unaccompanied by overt civil war must be rather detailed agreement, tacit or explicit, on what the end of apartheid means. But if there is to be such agreement, it must be the work of a broad coalition from all of the race/nations acting probably against the desires of two major groups: defenders of the status quo and proponents of revolutionary socialism. |
| |
Keywords: | Political Journalism Parliamentary Journalism Scottish Mass Media National Identity Civil Society Scottish Public Sphere |
|
|