首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论具体行政行为作为民事诉讼证据
引用本文:俞永民. 论具体行政行为作为民事诉讼证据[J]. 行政法学研究, 2006, 0(2): 100-105,143
作者姓名:俞永民
作者单位:浙江省余姚市纪律检查委员会,浙江,余姚,315400
摘    要:确认性行政行为和许可性行政行为等具体行政行为往往成为民事诉讼的重要证据,司法实践中对它们的处理方法各不相同,各有缺陷。民事诉讼和行政诉讼对具体行政行为的审查必须有所区别,具体行政行为作为证据在民事案件中出现,它的性质只能是民事证据,对它的审查也只能按照民事证据的规则进行。

关 键 词:具体行政行为  民事证据  审查  民事规则

On Specific Administrative Act as Evidence in Civil Proceedings
YU Yong-min. On Specific Administrative Act as Evidence in Civil Proceedings[J]. Administrative Law Review, 2006, 0(2): 100-105,143
Authors:YU Yong-min
Abstract:Specific administrative act such as declaratory act and administrative license act usually play an important role as evidence in civil proceedings. In practice, there are several ways to deal with this situation, with respective defects. Actually, differences in the judicial review of both administrative litigations and civil proceedings should be recognized. When a specific administrative act functions in civil proceedings as a piece of evidence, it can only be reviewed by civil rules.
Keywords:Specific administrative act  Evidence in Civil Proceedings  Review  Civil Rules
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号