首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

重大责任事故罪罪过形式研究
引用本文:刘守芬,申柳华. 重大责任事故罪罪过形式研究[J]. 法学论坛, 2006, 21(1): 101-107
作者姓名:刘守芬  申柳华
作者单位:北京大学法学院,北京,100871;北京大学法学院,北京,100871
摘    要:近几年来,各类重大责任事故频发,使得重大责任事故罪成为关注的焦点。通过对国外刑法中重大责任事故罪的罪过形式以及我国刑法理论界学说争议的分析研究,提出我国现行刑法中重大责任事故罪的罪过形式只能是过失,间接故意、复合罪过都不宜成为该罪的罪过形式的观点。罪过形式之争的根源在于我国刑法中间接故意与过于自信过失理论自身的缺陷,导致的罪过交叉现象———罪过“模糊”。最后,根据对危害结果的“认识标准”和“关系类型”,对该罪过失类型进行了分类。

关 键 词:重大责任事故罪  罪过形式  罪过模糊  监督过失
文章编号:1009-8003(2006)01-0101-07
修稿时间:2005-12-05

Study on Offence Form of Negligently Causing Serious Accident Crime
LIU Shou-fen,SHEN Liu-hua. Study on Offence Form of Negligently Causing Serious Accident Crime[J]. Legal Forum, 2006, 21(1): 101-107
Authors:LIU Shou-fen  SHEN Liu-hua
Abstract:In recent years,the study of Negligently Causing Serious Accident Crime become the focus of attention for the frequent occurrence of various serious accidents arising from negligence.Through the comparative study on the offence form of Negligently Causing Serious Accident Crime in foreign Criminal Laws and the doctrine dispute in Chinese Criminal Law theory field,this article advances that the offence form of Negligently Causing Serious Accident Crime in Chinese Criminal Law is can but negligence,not indirect intention and complex offense.The root of the dispute about offence form consists of the offence faintness,namely offence crossover due to the defect of the theory of indirect intention and negligence with undue assumption.Finally,the article classifies the type of negligence of this crime according to the understanding standard and relationship type of harmful consequences.
Keywords:Negligently Causing Serious Accident Crime  Offence Form  Offence Faintness  Supervision Negligence.
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号