再论无权处分——以处分行为与物权行为的价值冲突为突破口

通过对无权处分行为制度进行历史考察、价值分析及其与相关制度的衔接问题的分析,得出以下结论:无权处分行为的性质应当界定为债权行为,它的效力应当不受处分人的“处分权”的影响,它已从传统的效力待定的法律行为类型中逃离,而成为有效的法律行为。至于无权处分中的物权变动效力,在有效的债权行为的基础上,结合债权形式主义的物权变动模式和善意取得制度,这个问题便迎刃而解。无权处分人有无处分权以及原权利人是否追认只是债的履行问题,这样就避开了适用处分行为(物权行为)这个矛盾而又费解的规则。这样的立法不仅简洁实用,而且还能够使无权处分制度很好地与其他制度协调起来。

Discussing Disposing Act with No Right Again

This article will put foreword new viewpoints about the nature and effect of disposing act with no right, on the basis of which analyze its history, value and certain systematic harmony. In detail, this article argues that the nature of disposing act with no right should be juristic act of bearing liability, and its validity is free from the right of disposing, and it has become effective juristic act which has escaped from the uncertain effect of juristic act.On the basis of the effective act of bearing liability, combining it with the changing mode of right in rem in the light of the combining credit with formalism, the effect of right in rem in disposing act with no right will be solved easily. Furthermore, the disposing right and reversals do not affect on validity of juristic act, only on performing contract, Which contributes to withdraw exercising the contradictory and puzzling rules of juristic act to right in rem. As a result, the mode of legislation not only is simple and practical but also makes the system of disposing act with no right harmony with others.