首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

中韩环境纠纷解决机制比较研究
引用本文:李建勋,颜正魁. 中韩环境纠纷解决机制比较研究[J]. 黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报, 2007, 0(3): 98-100
作者姓名:李建勋  颜正魁
作者单位:武汉大学,法学院,武汉,430072;桃江县三堂街镇中心小学,湖南,桃江,413401
摘    要:随着经济的迅猛发展,环境问题日益显著,环境纠纷也越来越多,日益增多的环境纠纷得不到很好的解决,既损害了受害人的环境权益又不利于经济的增长与和谐社会的建设.通过对比研究我国与韩国在环境纠纷解决机制方面的异同,可以借鉴韩国的有益经验,以促进我国的环境法制建设.首先,可以参照韩国的做法,制定专门的环境纠纷调解法,以明确环境行政机关解决环境纠纷的法定义务;其次,应完善我国环境纠纷的诉讼外解决机制;再次,应建立激励公众参与的机制.

关 键 词:环境纠纷  调解  仲裁  行政调解
文章编号:1008-7966(2007)03-0098-03
修稿时间:2007-03-24

A Comparative Study of the Chinese and Korean Environmental Dispute Settlement Mechanism
LI Jian-xun,YAN Zheng-kui. A Comparative Study of the Chinese and Korean Environmental Dispute Settlement Mechanism[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law, 2007, 0(3): 98-100
Authors:LI Jian-xun  YAN Zheng-kui
Abstract:With the rapid economic development,environmental issues and disputes are more and more serious,which will do harm to the victims' interestes and the construction of harmonious society if can't be solved properly.By comparing the sameness and difference of resolving systems of environmental disputes between China and South Korea,some good experience from which will enhance our building environmental legal system.Firstly,we will make out special environmental resolving laws and regulations by learning from Korea,in order to specify the regulatory obligations of environmental administrative branches.Secondly,we should better our non-legitation mechanism.Thirdly,we should establish mechanism to encourage the public to participate.
Keywords:environmental dispute  mediation  arbitration  administrative intercession
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号