| 物权请求权不应适用诉讼时效 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张鹏. 物权请求权不应适用诉讼时效[J]. 天津市政法管理干部学院学报, 2004, 20(3): 23-26 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张鹏 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国人民大学法学院 北京100872 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 物权请求权是否适用诉讼时效是一个争论很大的问题,有的国家或地区适用,如德国、台湾,有的国家不适用,如瑞士。德国、台湾法上,物权请求权虽然适用诉讼时效,但实际功效甚小。依照物权请求权的性质,以及物权请求权和取得时效之间的关系,物权请求权还是不适用诉讼时效为宜。世界上大多数的国家也都是采纳的此种立法例。所以,我国将来制定民法典时也应当规定物权请求权不适用诉讼时效。
|
| 关 键 词： | 物权请求权 取得时效 诉讼时效 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-8393(2004)03-0023-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004-03-10 |
The Application Right of Thing Right Should not be Applied by the Limitation of Action |
| |
| ZHANG Peng. The Application Right of Thing Right Should not be Applied by the Limitation of Action[J]. Journal of Tianjin Administrative Institute of Political Science & Law, 2004, 20(3): 23-26 |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Peng |
| |
| Abstract: | If the application right of thing right is applied by the limitation of action is a problem. Many countries have many different answers. In the law of Germany and Taiwan, the application right of thing right is applied by the limitation of action. But in practice, this rule is used very poorly. In fact, by nature, the application right of thing right should not be applied by the limitation of action. So the writer suggests that the coming civil code should not adopt the rule. |
| |
| Keywords: | the application right of thing right usucaption the limitation of action |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
