From paparazzi to hidden cameras: The aggressive side of a free and responsible press

This article examines the complex of cultural effects and possible legal responses in the wake of the Princess of Wales' death. To say that the paparazzi were complicit in her death is to forget that, in spite of their frequently invasive means of obtaining news, these were also the kind of journalists who were complicit in the public celebration of her life. Had the Hutchins Commission this tragedy to include in its deliberations about press responsibility, it likely would have stated its indignation and suggested Diana's death as more evidence that journalists be regulated. But this article argues that aggressive journalism, as with any other of the press' activities, is beholden to a balance of public interests. These interests include the need for the public to be both informed and protected from invasion of privacy or criminal conduct by any journalist.