Should lawyers listen to philosophers about legal ethics? |
| |
Authors: | M. B. E. Smith |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Smith College, 01061 Northampton, Massachusetts, U.S.A. |
| |
Abstract: | In the recent spate of philosophers' writing on legal ethics, most contend that lawyers' professional role exposes them to great risk of moral wrongdoing; and some even conclude that the role's demands inevitably corrupt lawyers' characters. In assessing their arguments, I take up three questions: (1) whether philosophers' training and experience give them authority to scold lawyers; (2) whether anything substantive has emerged in the scolding that lawyers are morally bound to take to heart; and (3) whether lawyers ought to defer to philosophers' claims about moral principle. I return a negative answer to each.Excerpts from a earlier draft have appeared in A. Kaufman, Problems in Professional Responsibility, (Boston: Little, Brown, 3rd ed. 1989) pp. 758–65. Thanks are owed to Steve Munzer and to Andy Kaufman for their encouragement and advice. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|