首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

民事诉讼费用制度与司法公正关系考——兼论我国民事诉讼费用制度的立法缺陷
引用本文:廖永安,赵晓薇. 民事诉讼费用制度与司法公正关系考——兼论我国民事诉讼费用制度的立法缺陷[J]. 贵州警官职业学院学报, 2004, 16(3): 35-39
作者姓名:廖永安  赵晓薇
作者单位:湘潭大学法学院,湖南,湘潭,411105
基金项目:该文系湖南省教育厅重点资助项目
摘    要:人们选择司法是因为相信司法是维护公平正义的,但在司法实践中,司法不公的现象已成为社会的痼疾.作为民事司法制度的重要组成部分,民事诉讼费用制度对司法公正的影响不客忽视,而我国民事诉讼费用制度存在着缺陷.应积极稳妥地推进制度建设,并赋予国民如不服诉讼费用的决定可提起上诉的权利,加强诉权对审判权的有效限制和监督,以从真正意义上对诉讼费用制度予以规制.

关 键 词:诉讼费用  司法公正  立法缺陷
文章编号:1671-5195(2004)03-0035-05
修稿时间:2003-12-30

A Textual Research on Relations Between the System of Civil Litigation Cost and Judicial Just--On the Legislative Defects of Our System of Civil Litigation cost
LIAO Yong-an,ZHAO Xiao-Wei. A Textual Research on Relations Between the System of Civil Litigation Cost and Judicial Just--On the Legislative Defects of Our System of Civil Litigation cost[J]. Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College, 2004, 16(3): 35-39
Authors:LIAO Yong-an  ZHAO Xiao-Wei
Abstract:People select justice because they have the belief in its function to safeguard fairness and just, but in the judicial practice, the unfair justice has become a serious social phenomenon. This paper points out that the system of civil litigation cost, as one of the important components of the civil judicial system, its effects of on judicial just shouldn't be ignored. In addition, there're still some defects in our current system of civil litigation cost, and we must actively push forward our systematic construction, entitle people to the rights of appeal when they refuse to accept the judgment of litigation cost, strengthen the restrictive and supervisory effects of litigious rights on judicial power, so as to regulate the system of civil litigation cost in a real meaning.
Keywords:litigation cost  judicial just  legislative defects
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号