首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Overriding Psychiatric Advance Directives: Factors Associated with Psychiatrists' Decisions to Preempt Patients' Advance Refusal of Hospitalization and Medication
Authors:Jeffrey W. Swanson  S. Van McCrary  Marvin S. Swartz  Richard A. Van Dorn  Eric B. Elbogen
Affiliation:(1) Services Effectiveness Research Program in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3071, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA;(2) Division of Medicine in Society, Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, State University of New York at Stony Brook, New York, USA
Abstract:Psychiatric advance directives (PADs) are intended to support patients' treatment decisions during a crisis. However, PAD statutes give clinicians broad discretion over whether to carry out patients' advance instructions. This study uses data from a survey of psychiatrists (N=164) to examine reasons for overriding PADs. In response to a hypothetical vignette, 47% of psychiatrists indicated that they would override a valid, competently-executed PAD that refused hospitalization and medication. PAD override was more likely among psychiatrists who worked in hospital emergency departments; those who were concerned about patients' violence risk and lack of insight; and those who were legally defensive. PAD override was less likely among participants who believed that involuntary treatment is largely unnecessary in a high-quality mental health system.
Keywords:Psychiatric advance directives  Severe mental illness  Psychiatric disorders  Mental health law
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号