能动司法背景下的法律方法诉求

近年来,能动司法成为法学界的一个研究热点,本文通过探讨我国能动司法与美国司法能动主义的区别,阐述我国的能动司法不是简单的裁判理念,而是一种政治型能动政策。理想的司法能动是功能上的能动与方法上克制的统一,当前我国的能动司法属于政策推动性质,缺乏对能动的应有规范,而法律方法恰好能从有效性和正当性方面对司法活动予以必要的规制,因此也就成为当前我国能动司法的必然诉求。

The Resort to Legal Methods Under the Background of Judicial Activism

Judicial activism has become a hot point in recent years.This paper tries to explain the difference between Chinese judicial activism and its counterpart in American,then,it expounds that judicial activism is not only a judicial conception but also a political idea.The ideal judicial activism is a combination of activism on function and restraint on methods.The judicial activism is promoted by policy in our country,it is in lack of regulations,and the legal methods can regulate the judicial process on both effectiveness and validity,so it is necessary for us to resort to the legal methods.