首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

可罚的违法性:一个中国视阈的思索——兼论刑事政策对可罚性判断的规范化意义
引用本文:刘博涵. 可罚的违法性:一个中国视阈的思索——兼论刑事政策对可罚性判断的规范化意义[J]. 河南司法警官职业学院学报, 2014, 0(1): 57-61
作者姓名:刘博涵
作者单位:南京师范大学法学院,江苏南京210097
摘    要:可罚的违法性是大陆法系违法论的重要内容,有深厚的理论基础和成熟的判断标准。我国刑法的但书和罪量规定也有轻微行为出罪功能,不能以但书作为直接出罪依据,罪量规定能在罪质与罪量两维度区分罪与非罪。罪刑法定原则要求的明确性只能做到相对明确,宣示考察罪量因素的但书应坚持,但标准应交予法官把握,罪量规定应删除。刑事政策作为可罚性判断的影响因素和刑法解释的填充实体,将价值判断与刑法规范关联起来。

关 键 词:可罚的违法性  但书  罪量规定  刑事政策  刑法解释

The Theory of Punishable Illegality -- Discussing the Standardized Effect of Criminal Policy on Punish Ability Judgment
Affiliation:LIU Bo - han (Law School of Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023 )
Abstract:The theory of punishable illegality is the important content in the Continental Legal System' s theory of il- legality, it has a profound the oretieal basis and appropriate judgment standard. In China, the proviso to article 13 and quantitative provisions in specific provisions of criminal law have the function of expelling misdemeanor from crimes as well. The judge couldn't make an acquittal only according to the proviso to article 13. The quantitative provisions can distinguish crime or non - crime from two aspects of crime character and crime degree. Definiteness required by principle of legality can only realize relative definiteness. In legislation, the proviso to article 13, which declare to consider quantitative factors should be retained, but the specific criteria should be mastered by the jud- ges, the quantitative provisions in specific provisions of criminal law should be deleted. Criminal policy as one of the important factors affecting to punishability judgment and the entity of filling criminal law interpretation, associ- ates value judgment with criminal law norms.
Keywords:punishable illegality  proviso to article 13  quantitative provisions  criminal policy  criminal law inter-pretation
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号